Let us start off with the principle that you cannot eat silver and gold, i.e., survive on it.
So, the question to you is who is your [G]od?...
The "men" who have made silver and gold a medium of exchange/commodity, or The One that has provided the natural source for sustaining yourself?
Before we get into any particulars, simply understand that when there is any kind of currency or medium of exchange established by a state or central government, that medium allows that government to be a pimp, i.e., a do nothing-middleman between people so it can get its piece of the pie.
Yes, it is agreed; the parallel is a bit harsh, but it illustrates the unscrupulous nature in the character of the relationship. Actually, the governments do a lot of "procuring" in gathering property from their "citizens". To grasp the concept of this parallel relationship better, you may want to see "procurer" under the definition of "pimp".
To broaden your understanding on this issue, it was said that Mayer Amschel Rothschild had stated the following:
"Let me issue and control a nation's money and I care not who writes the laws."
In view of this Rothschild principle, the currency as issued by the United States is unlawful. A group of private people weaseled their way into a "pimp" position to use government force to back up their enterprise. Unknown to most, the Federal Reserve─being a private enterprise─is the "pimp" as approved by the United States. Currently, income tax is the way the pimp is getting his piece of the pie. People of America have been funding world development of other countries for fifty years or more with this system (see International Monetary Fund). An intelligent man would call this slavery. The same system drained the gold from the hands of Americans during the Depression era (see Gold Hoarding Executive Order).
The Bible teaches us that the love of money is the root of all evil... But today, everyone is happy, right?
So, the point being made is:
Who needs money issued by a central government that can be manipulated by a few who appear to love it?
Accordingly, we must look at the difference between so-called "capitalism" and "agrarianism", view sources.
People who are interested in international commerce will argue that a common currency is needed to expand business between countries. As each state in the Union is a country, this was basically the argument that the architects of the Constitution made, more on the ConJob,click here. Most of these people were elitists and sold items across state lines. Of course, at that time most people in America were of an agrarian culture and could have cared less about such noted medium of exchange. They used local mediums of exchange and barter and trade systems to accomplish their needs.
Having those simple facts in mind, are you starting to understand the need for a central government currency now?
The currency of a central government serves the capitalist. It aids in his greed as it allows him to monopolize a market in world trade using the weakest countries to profit on. It is understood that some amount of foreign trade is required, but not on a large scale. Most manufacturing, etc. can be done on a local scale. It provides people with a local economy, which includes a sustainable work force. To support such ideas, here is a summation of which illustrates these noted principles argued by two of our founding fathers, Alexander Hamilton, agent of the money interests and main architect (or "pusher") for the Constitution, and, Thomas Jefferson, the third President and architect of the Declaration of Independence:
Hamilton took as his major premise the evil nature of man and followed with the consequent need for an authoritative government in the hands of the propertied, who had a "stake in society" and therefore had most to gain or lose by government; Jefferson argued that since man is naturally well-disposed toward his fellows, all that is necessary for a good society is sufficient training and opportunity to make all men realize that their own good derives from the common good. Hamilton believed the principal duty of government was to protect private property and the sanctity of contract; Jefferson saw it as promoting the general welfare over and above any consideration of wealth.... Hamilton saw American prosperity rising through industrial capitalism; Jefferson looked with suspicion and disfavor upon mercantile activity, found it enslaving, deceitful, predatory, and contrary to man's natural desire to live free and relatively self-sufficient by the fruit of his own labors. Instead of manufacturing, he placed his hopes in an agrarian economy. ~Agrarian quotes, Dictionary.com
As you can see, Jefferson was the one that had it right: an agrarian economy. However, as we can see the ideas of Hamilton, the agent of the money interests, has won out. Today we see, the New World Order is the essence of what Hamilton was pushing. This should tell all you "fans" of the Constitution what the "revered document" was truly about. The way the constitutional system is setup now, people of America are controlled both by the money and the law.
The 14th Amendment is the mechanism that allows the noted travesty to expand itself to the nth degree. The political approval of people and those taking benefits from government is ultimately their entry into the abyss of slavery.
IN SUMMARY: What is ultimately described herein is a government of fascism that uses socialism as its base. The blueprint is the Communist Manifesto, which was drafted by a stooge named Karl Marx. Every American must understand, all Planks of "his" Manifesto are applied in America, which includes the positioning of a central bank and income tax. A private based system that is not backed in silver and gold, but yet─with nothing loaned─such system charges an interest on its printing of phony money. Moreover, it should be noted that the Spartans were also of a fascist makeup. The rulers of this culture let its subjects own silver and gold as a privilege; just as the United States does at this point in time... Hey students... Go Spartans!
Also understand, the "pimp mechanism" does not just end with the money; it is utilized throughout government structure, from the state erected corporations to their municipalities, i.e., cities, towns (via power, phone, etc).
People of America must move "Off the Grids" to distance themselves from this abuse. Local economies that use the modern tools available for agrarianism sprinkled with local "in state" manufacturing will get this done, i.e., Starve the Beast.
Simply, money can be manipulated. As long as people hold the creations of man in honor, they will be affected and controlled by his orchestrated booms and busts... Where God just provides.
Bring it on home... It is time to DUMPthePIMPS!
The Coalition
To the left, the current Mack Daddy for the corporate world.
As a rule, fascist governments are dominated by a dictator, who usually possesses a magnetic personality, wears a showy uniform, and rallies his followers by mass parades; appeals to strident nationalism; and promotes suspicion or hatred of both foreigners and "impure" people within his own nation, such as the Jews in Germany. Although both communism and fascism are forms of totalitarianism, fascism does not demand state ownership of the means of production, nor is fascism committed to the achievement of economic equality. In theory, communism opposes the identification of government with a single charismatic leader (cult of personality), which is the cornerstone of fascism. Whereas communists are considered left-wing, fascists are usually described as right-wing.
The doctrines of Karl Marx and his associate Friedrich Engels on economics, politics, and society. They include the notion of economic determinism ─ that political and social structures are determined by the economic conditions of people. Marxism calls for a classless society, where all means of production are commonly owned, a system to be reached as an inevitable result of the struggle between capitalists and workers.
─noun. An economic system in which investment in and ownership of the means of production, distribution, and exchange of wealth is made and maintained chiefly by private individuals or corporations, especially as contrasted to cooperatively or state-owned means of wealth.
─adjective
1. relating to land, land tenure, or the division of landed property: agrarian laws.
2. pertaining to the advancement of agricultural groups: an agrarian movement.
3. composed of or pertaining to farmers: an agrarian co-op.
4. rural; agricultural.
5. growing in fields; wild: an agrarian plant.
─noun
6. a person who favors the equal division of landed property and the advancement of agricultural groups.
Word Origin & History. Agrarian. 1610s, "relating to the land," from M.Fr. loy agrarienne "agrarian law," from L. Lex agraria , the Roman law for the division of conquered lands, from agrarius "of the land," from ager (gen. agri ) "a field," from PIE *agros (cf. Gk. agros "field," Goth. akrs , O.E. aecer "field;" see acre). Meaning "having to do with cultivated land" first recorded 1792.